Patabook: Happy Hostage Day

This image popped up on my Facebook account as a memory, stating that I’d posted it seven years ago. To be exact, June 19, 2014, about two weeks before Independence Day. I put this image together because I love this holiday and what it meant to this great country and great people. But in seven years, a lot has changed. We have learned about things that we didn’t know even existed. We have experienced things that we didn’t even think we would ever go through. In seven years, Donald Trump was able to politically twist some arms and become the president of the United States. The shocking thing about this was that Donald Trump was a liberal billionaire Democrat from New York, married three times, two of his wives were foreigners, and one day, Trump went down the escalator with a Bible in his hand and got the Christian/ Republican/Conservative nomination. Only to be ousted by a nominee who ran his campaign from his basement and had drive-through rallies. The defeat of Donald Trump four years later was so treacherous by the congressional leadership from both sides of the aisle. I mean, some of the Republican figures, such as Mitt Romney, were out to destroy Donald Trump, even though he had more voters and die-hard supporters than any Republican in the past. And the same scheme used  against Al Gore during the presidential election of 2000 was used against Trump but was multiplied by five. Another word, what happened to Al Gore in 2000 in Florida happened to Donald Trump in 2020 in five or more different states. As a country, are we independent? The answer would be Yes. But the question we need to be asking ourselves is, as a nation, are we “sovereign”? The answer I think, would be a big “NO!”. I looked up the word sovereignty on Google, and this is what came up; <ul> <li>Supreme power, especially over a political unit (as a country).</li> <li>A country's independent authority and right of self-control.”</li> </ul>   When the Europeans and specifically the British began their global exploration, they conquered more lands and acquired “treasures” from around the world and the new world. Around the 18th and 20th  centuries, the British Empire acquired more territories, making it the largest empire in history. The Empire had establishments in Africa, Asia, Europe, America, and numerous Islands across the globe. Historians established that roughly 25% of the earth’s landmass was in control of the British. The region was so extensive that at any one time, there was daylight in one of the territories. The saying, “The Empire on which the sun never sets,” has been used to explain the vastness of the British Empire. Looking at America today, despite recently closing hundreds of bases in Iraq and Afghanistan, the United States still maintains nearly 800 military bases in more than 70 countries and territories abroad. Britain, France and Russia, by contrast, have about 30 foreign bases combined. Drawing the parallels here, it’s not hard to conclude that the Modern USA is a continuation of British imperialism. If you ask Google the following question, “Where did Freemasonry begin?” The answer is: England. Freemasonry began in 1717 with the founding of the Grand Lodge, an association of Masonic lodges in England. However, Freemason societies have existed for much longer. The most popular theory is that Freemasonry emerged out of the stone-masonry guilds of the Middle Ages. <table style="border-collapse:collapse;width:100%;height:241px;margin-left:auto;margin-right:auto;" border="1"> <tbody> <tr style="height:241px;"> <td style="width:19.2031%;height:241px;border-style:hidden;"><img src="https://patabook.com/content/uploads/photos/2021/07/patabook_2401ff7e29f01e7044dc42fb21019dfe.jpg" alt="" width="213" height="213" /></td> <td style="width:76.0366%;height:241px;border-style:hidden;">This brings us to a theory that one system controlled and continues to control both nations. Therefore, the United States is an offshoot of the British Empire, politically, ideologically and socially. The fact that George Washington was a Freemason and half of our former presidents were Freemason, an organization founded in England, it unequivocally leads to the conclusion that our national decisions are not made locally but rather by an “Oligarchy” headquartered somewhere in Europe.</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> This article is not about any conspiracy theories and the name to describe world rulers and evildoers, bla bla bla.  This is plain and simple about the question I asked, “As Americans, do we have the choice to govern our country and be a sovereign nation?” After the invasion of Kuwait by Saddam Hussein on August 2 1990, President George Bush (The father) talked to the press, saying that this was an Arab issue and  military intervention was not an option. It may not be a coincidence that when Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait, the Prime Minister of England, Margaret Thatcher, happened to be at Colorado's Aspen Institute at the time, awaiting the arrival of President George H.W. Bush. Soon after he got there, they held a joint news conference. Saddam Hussein began his invasion of Kuwait on August 2 1990,  a Thursday. On the morning of Wednesday, August 1 1990, Margret Thatcher left Heathrow Airport bound for Aspen, Colorado.  Here is a video where H.W. Bush talked to reporters, and one of the questions from Bret Hume was, “You said yesterday morning in the cabinet room that you are not discussing intervention, now you’re saying and have been saying since yesterday afternoon, all options are open. What has changed?” <a href="https://www.c-span.org/video/?158497-1/iraqi-invasion-kuwait">Iraqi Invasion of Kuwait | C-SPAN.org</a> Of course, politicians always prepare and rehearse for any possible question that may be asked. W.H. Bush was short and sweet and did not volunteer any additional information. Quite a performance. One of the journalists wrote, “Watching it now,(after 10years), I'd describe the differences between Bush and Thatcher as largely stylistic. When she talked, Thatcher always sounded like a hammer pounding a nail. Bush sounded tentative, even when his words were emphatic. Watching it then, I remember thinking, "She's giving him the backbone to go to war." That, apparently, was also Thatcher's impression. She later recalled what she'd advised Bush privately. "Indeed, I told him that aggressors must be stopped, not only stopped, but they must be thrown out. An aggressor cannot gain from his aggression. He must be thrown out, and really, by that time in my mind, I thought we ought to throw him out so decisively that he could never think of doing it again. "Or as she told Bush a few days later, "Remember, George, this is no time to go wobbly." It's interesting that Thatcher, in Aspen, talked of teaching Hussein a lesson, not driving him out of power in Iraq. When Bush ended the Gulf War with Kuwait liberated but Baghdad uninvaded and Hussein still in charge there, he was criticized for not finishing the job he'd started. If he'd sounded more bellicose at the get-go, if he'd out-Thatchered Thatcher at Aspen, maybe he'd have gotten the benefit of the doubt. Bush enjoyed repeating the advice Thatcher had given him—don't go wobbly. I wonder if his son, George W., ever thought it was funny. George W.'s fixation on invading Iraq in 2003 is more easily explained in terms of family honor than faulty intelligence. According to Bob Woodward, W. didn't ask for his father's counsel or blessing. "You know he is the wrong father to appeal to in terms of strength," said the son. "There is a higher father that I appeal to." Looking at this and analyzing this molds the idea that even a president of the United States is being goaded or instructed on what to do. And for the essence of the meeting, it’s clear that H.W. Bush did not want to go to war but was forced to. There are rumors that H.W. Bush was a high-ranking Freemason. George W. Bush had hoped to use the Masonic Bible that had been used both by George Washington in 1789 his father, George H. W. Bush, in 1989. This historic Bible had been transported, under guard, from New York to Washington D.C. for the Inauguration, but due to “inclement” weather, a family Bible was substituted instead. Why is this essential to be known and recognized by every single American? Or maybe I should say by every single person who lives, loves and appreciates this country. In a recent visit to Las Vegas, in the pool, we met a couple of gentlemen. Both were named Michael, and we endeavored into the same discussion. Being politically correct, I stated that I don’t care about all this, I just want to take care of my family and live happily. Both Michaels agreed with me. But this was the sensitive diplomatic way of having a conversation. The fact a higher system controls us makes us servants to that system and makes our country a branch, not a nation. We work for that system, and all the wealth that we fight for and grab from around the world is passed on to this higher system. Our boys go to war, get killed or injured, and most of them come back with some sort of mental illness. Also, many Conservative Republicans believe that one of the reasons that Donald Trump shoved himself and was appointed as the President of the United States was not to build a wall between the US and Mexico but rather to break away from this oligarchy and form its own independent system, but the Talons of the European eagle are deeply clenched in the American political body.   Two fromer presidents tried to break free from this system; Lincoln and Kennedy, both were assasinated and replaced by their VP's who were Freemasons. I just hope one day, as Americans, instead of saying Happy Fourth, we would say, “Happy Sovereignty Day.” George David

source https://patabook.com/blogs/100696/Happy-Hostage-Day

Patabook

Friday, 2 July 2021

Happy Hostage Day

No comments:

Post a Comment

Antifa Groups Charged with Violently Countering California ‘Patriot March’

Report Abuse